Richard: “Eliezer answer might refer to the difference between the simplicity of Autobliss 1.0 and the complexity of a human.”
I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t say that. Rather, the claim (if I’m reading him correctly) is that the true referent of good really is a really complicated bundle of human values. In a material universe, you can’t cash out “intrinsic goodness” in the intuitive way.
Richard: “Eliezer answer might refer to the difference between the simplicity of Autobliss 1.0 and the complexity of a human.”
I’m pretty sure he wouldn’t say that. Rather, the claim (if I’m reading him correctly) is that the true referent of good really is a really complicated bundle of human values. In a material universe, you can’t cash out “intrinsic goodness” in the intuitive way.