Suggestion: teach rationality as an open spirit of enquiry, not as a secular rleigion that will turn you into a clone of Richard Dawkins.
Instead of down voting maybe we should instead be asking what within the LW community caused Peterdjones to say that?
How about “in addition to”? I don’t know anyone on LW who’s been turned into a Dawkins clone.
I am not sure that being a Dawkins clone is a completely bad thing either.
Suggestion: teach rationality as an open spirit of enquiry, not as a secular rleigion that will turn you into a clone of Richard Dawkins.
Instead of down voting maybe we should instead be asking what within the LW community caused Peterdjones to say that?
How about “in addition to”? I don’t know anyone on LW who’s been turned into a Dawkins clone.
I am not sure that being a Dawkins clone is a completely bad thing either.