But I don’t understand how any town that allows indoor dining can categorize trick-or-treating as impermissibly high risk?
I think it’s about risk versus reward, rather than risk per se. If you allow indoor dining, the restaurant owners make money and won’t fail or need bailouts (as often). Trick or treating doesn’t offer as much benefit economically.
(Not endorsing this reasoning, just trying to empathize).
I think it’s about risk versus reward, rather than risk per se. If you allow indoor dining, the restaurant owners make money and won’t fail or need bailouts (as often). Trick or treating doesn’t offer as much benefit economically.
(Not endorsing this reasoning, just trying to empathize).
I think you made a good effort at intellectual charity!