I completely agree with what you are saying. Disagreement requires shared meaning. Cons. and Deont. are rival
theories, not alternative meanings.
(ETA: To any bystanders still following this argument, I feel like I’m starting to repeat myself without making much progress in resolving this disagreement. Any suggestion what to do?)
Good question. There’s a lot of momentum behind the “meaning theory”.
I completely agree with what you are saying. Disagreement requires shared meaning. Cons. and Deont. are rival theories, not alternative meanings.
Good question. There’s a lot of momentum behind the “meaning theory”.