I’m afraid I won’t have time to give you more help. There’s a short summary of each sequence under the link at the top of the page, so it won’t take you forever to see the relevance.
EDIT: you’re wondering elsewhere in the thread why you’re not being well received. It’s because your post doesn’t make contact with what other people have thought on the topic.
I put “enjoy itself” in quotes, because I don’t mean it literally. The questions that that sequence addresses according to the summary don’t seem relevant to what I am trying to get at.
I guess I need to be more precise. I just mean how can we maximize the integral of experience through time (whether we let experience take negative values is a detail). This was one of Tegmark’s proposals in that paper, already, except he is writing in terms of a final goal instead of a process, which was the point of my post...
“The amount of consciousness in our Universe, which Giulio Tononi has argued corresponds to integrated information”
Maybe tell me why I should? My time is valuable.
I’m afraid I won’t have time to give you more help. There’s a short summary of each sequence under the link at the top of the page, so it won’t take you forever to see the relevance.
EDIT: you’re wondering elsewhere in the thread why you’re not being well received. It’s because your post doesn’t make contact with what other people have thought on the topic.
I put “enjoy itself” in quotes, because I don’t mean it literally. The questions that that sequence addresses according to the summary don’t seem relevant to what I am trying to get at.
I guess I need to be more precise. I just mean how can we maximize the integral of experience through time (whether we let experience take negative values is a detail). This was one of Tegmark’s proposals in that paper, already, except he is writing in terms of a final goal instead of a process, which was the point of my post...
“The amount of consciousness in our Universe, which Giulio Tononi has argued corresponds to integrated information”