You’re changed it to an instrumentalist theory which focuses on prediction instead of explanation.
How so? I think it’s still an explanatory theory, it just explains 99% of something instead of 100%.
Where’s the explanation? What do you think an explanation is? You said the theory gets “approximately correct results” in some circumstances – doesn’t that mean making approximately correct predictions?
How so? I think it’s still an explanatory theory, it just explains 99% of something instead of 100%.
Where’s the explanation? What do you think an explanation is? You said the theory gets “approximately correct results” in some circumstances – doesn’t that mean making approximately correct predictions?