The OP said:
I’m way out of my depth here so I find it hard to judge
But look at this comment’s four critiques:
The scienceblogs review is devastating
Rossi has a history of fakery, per his Wikipedia page
What is supposedly evidence for the claims is actually quite weak (it’s not a news site, just a personal website)
This idea was discussed before and did not fare well.
The middle two are easily accessible even to those with zero relevant domain expertise.
The OP said:
But look at this comment’s four critiques:
The scienceblogs review is devastating
Rossi has a history of fakery, per his Wikipedia page
What is supposedly evidence for the claims is actually quite weak (it’s not a news site, just a personal website)
This idea was discussed before and did not fare well.
The middle two are easily accessible even to those with zero relevant domain expertise.