Good point well made. I have nothing to add but agreement. Also I may steal this analogy and use it in future, just so you know.
Especially because you’ve noted that getting rid of the third guard does help. The argument that I see often but don’t understand is that trying to ditch the third guard is not worth doing because it doesn’t solve the wider peasant-injustice issue.
I don’t mean just with the police brutality/American race-relations thing either—it seems almost any time people want to put work into fixing Specific Issue X, there are other people standing back and saying it’s a waste of effort because it won’t solve Larger Issue Y. Winds me right up.
Good point well made. I have nothing to add but agreement. Also I may steal this analogy and use it in future, just so you know.
Especially because you’ve noted that getting rid of the third guard does help. The argument that I see often but don’t understand is that trying to ditch the third guard is not worth doing because it doesn’t solve the wider peasant-injustice issue.
I don’t mean just with the police brutality/American race-relations thing either—it seems almost any time people want to put work into fixing Specific Issue X, there are other people standing back and saying it’s a waste of effort because it won’t solve Larger Issue Y. Winds me right up.