I do wonder about a bit of tribalism over universal fairness in there. I think this is something Claude doesn’t endorse but does demonstrate. Claude has a moral stance which corresponds to a particular group (cosmopolitan Western liberal technocrat), and shows that towards these views in philosophical discussions (contrasted with a universal fairness stance).
Universal fairness itself is a value of a specific tribe, and that makes it… good? bad? hypocritical? self-inconsistent? no big deal, because any universal value had to historically appear at some place first?
I do wonder about a bit of tribalism over universal fairness in there. I think this is something Claude doesn’t endorse but does demonstrate. Claude has a moral stance which corresponds to a particular group (cosmopolitan Western liberal technocrat), and shows that towards these views in philosophical discussions (contrasted with a universal fairness stance).
That reminds me of: The Bedrock of Fairness.
Universal fairness itself is a value of a specific tribe, and that makes it… good? bad? hypocritical? self-inconsistent? no big deal, because any universal value had to historically appear at some place first?