The Cultural differences between Slavic Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are probably greater than between United Methodists and Souther Baptists (in the US).
I think that’s true, but would you say that the differences between Slavic Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are greater than the differences between Eastern Orthodox and Southern Baptists? That’s the sort of question I was thinking about when I wrote my original comment.
That’s probably better than including “Eastern Orthodox” among the “Other Christians” (the pre-Reformation / post-Reformation grouping is more natural) but it’s not ideal.
Perhaps three options: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Other Christian (the vast majority of ‘other Christian’ will be denominations descended from the Protestant Reformation)
Also: The ‘Roman Catholic’ religion option should probably be ‘Roman Catholic/Eastern Orthodox’.
As someone who is an atheist now but raised Greek Orthodox, this is a bad idea. The lack of a Pope alone makes for a large difference.
Why? There may not be many doctrinal differences between the two, but the cultural ones are pretty big.
Indeed, but they’re closer to each other than either is to, say, United Methodists or Southern Baptists.
The Cultural differences between Slavic Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are probably greater than between United Methodists and Souther Baptists (in the US).
I think that’s true, but would you say that the differences between Slavic Catholics and Eastern Orthodox are greater than the differences between Eastern Orthodox and Southern Baptists? That’s the sort of question I was thinking about when I wrote my original comment.
That’s probably better than including “Eastern Orthodox” among the “Other Christians” (the pre-Reformation / post-Reformation grouping is more natural) but it’s not ideal.
Perhaps three options: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Other Christian (the vast majority of ‘other Christian’ will be denominations descended from the Protestant Reformation)
How about letting people specify denomination.