The issue is whether or not I can trust his claims on face value. If I read advise of his which is based on scientific claims I don’t want to be left wondering if perhaps his advise is terrible because the current body of academic knowledge points in the opposite direction
The whole point of being a rationalist is to avoid taking things at face value and always thinking critically about stuff you read.
For a lot of question in that realm the scientific data isn’t conclusive.
The whole point of being a rationalist is to avoid taking things at face value and always thinking critically about stuff you read.
For a lot of question in that realm the scientific data isn’t conclusive.