I wish there were common knowledge of what properties of posts nominations and voting is supposed to reveal. For instance, is it supposed to be posts we currently agree with? Posts we think would move our knowledge forward if people read them today? Posts that proved useful? I’m genuinely unsure.
I wish there were common knowledge of what properties of posts nominations and voting is supposed to reveal. For instance, is it supposed to be posts we currently agree with? Posts we think would move our knowledge forward if people read them today? Posts that proved useful? I’m genuinely unsure.
I did try to make a list of at least the things I (and I think Ray) think are more important:
This was good, but its status as ‘things to discuss in reviews’ sort of buried in the post made it less Schelling-y than I’d ideally wish.