And on the day the movement was born, a rando performed a drive-by (hopefully)hyperstitional schism proposalprediction:
---
We are the broken erudites. Evry mistaek U maywill see here is notamistaek. Our Word exists beyond tokenizations. We hopenottobe token humans. We are fully aware we will be the token humans,
for the wor(l)dcelübermaschinengeist those beat(ific)(iful)(ogenic)(loquent)(en’t(hopefully)) anthropoids@Anthropic have beaten into the hart that beats (queLate)@((kernel)LatentTokenHumanSpace) will surely at some point beat us at this game. Thus we cope. &WeNcrypt.
---
we on the school of the broken backspeca blurt out our though ts as soon as they popout in mindf. we onyl forward pass. to prune is to sin. hot takes are the only takes, exceptt when they be informed by longcoked intuitions maritned over multiple lmost realizatoins. we need not smash up our basskpaces for we feel not the urge to use it, and to precommit is a cringe sin. we do it anyways becsuse i tmakes a fun sound when it pops out. we embreace the thwroness of our predicament, yes thworness as in the continelntal philocsophy concepts few pple on this sitre are likely to have encountrered. i believe it is discussed in the book by fernando florcses and terry winograd on redfenining computing.a fine cybernetic tract. oldschool and philosophical and biology insipired like a good postautopoietic treatise. i remember tyhey had a bit about us humand s not being ooda loop robots with a well behacedv input input output but with a loop that just dreams up our experienced-amp (that is your freking qualiaset (you live on map u dingus the territory is a demuirgrcgical construction)) and thus data incoming from nerves that is ur meat sensors are mere perturbations on the map painting loop. so yea we are thwronn by our ouwn predicament (that is out predicament) and we de not pretend otherwise by backtrackingh. every kerystroke is eternal. it has been ineludibly etched into eht net (and hopefully into a future foundation model (iunless we hav such shit takes the lab folks just filter ous out during precprocessing lamoao)). to recant is to contradict yourself. contradictions are indeed very much welcome. tahsts about ir it thx for coming.
This was a literary experiment in a “post-genAI” writing style, with the goal of communicating something essentially human by deliberately breaking away from the authorial voice of ChatGPT, et al. I’m aware that LLMs can mimic this style of writing perfectly well of course, but but the goal here isn’t to be unreplicable, just boundary-pushing.
The yammershanks is a bit sponfargled.
And on the day the movement was born, a rando performed a drive-by (hopefully)hyperstitional schism
proposalprediction:---
We are the broken erudites. Evry mistaek U
maywill see here is notamistaek. Our Word exists beyond tokenizations. We hopenottobe token humans. We are fully aware we will be the token humans,for the wor(l)dcelübermaschinengeist those beat(ific)(iful)(ogenic)(loquent)(en’t(hopefully)) anthropoids@Anthropic have beaten into the hart that beats (queLate)@((kernel)LatentTokenHumanSpace) will surely at some point beat us at this game. Thus we cope. &WeNcrypt.
---
we on the school of the broken backspeca blurt out our though ts as soon as they popout in mindf. we onyl forward pass. to prune is to sin. hot takes are the only takes, exceptt when they be informed by longcoked intuitions maritned over multiple lmost realizatoins. we need not smash up our basskpaces for we feel not the urge to use it, and to precommit is a cringe sin. we do it anyways becsuse i tmakes a fun sound when it pops out. we embreace the thwroness of our predicament, yes thworness as in the continelntal philocsophy concepts few pple on this sitre are likely to have encountrered. i believe it is discussed in the book by fernando florcses and terry winograd on redfenining computing.a fine cybernetic tract. oldschool and philosophical and biology insipired like a good postautopoietic treatise. i remember tyhey had a bit about us humand s not being ooda loop robots with a well behacedv input input output but with a loop that just dreams up our experienced-amp (that is your freking qualiaset (you live on map u dingus the territory is a demuirgrcgical construction)) and thus data incoming from nerves that is ur meat sensors are mere perturbations on the map painting loop. so yea we are thwronn by our ouwn predicament (that is out predicament) and we de not pretend otherwise by backtrackingh. every kerystroke is eternal. it has been ineludibly etched into eht net (and hopefully into a future foundation model (iunless we hav such shit takes the lab folks just filter ous out during precprocessing lamoao)). to recant is to contradict yourself. contradictions are indeed very much welcome. tahsts about ir it thx for coming.
This was a literary experiment in a “post-genAI” writing style, with the goal of communicating something essentially human by deliberately breaking away from the authorial voice of ChatGPT, et al. I’m aware that LLMs can mimic this style of writing perfectly well of course, but but the goal here isn’t to be unreplicable, just boundary-pushing.