Well I’m merely an amateur when it comes to philosophy of science, but I seem to encounter more Popperians of one sort or another than not.
Without some sort of causality, there’s no way to make predictions. As was recently pointed out, causality does not imply correlation; the theory that RichardKennaway’s device operates causally predicts almost perfectly its behavior. Do you have a better method?
Well I’m merely an amateur when it comes to philosophy of science, but I seem to encounter more Popperians of one sort or another than not.
Without some sort of causality, there’s no way to make predictions. As was recently pointed out, causality does not imply correlation; the theory that RichardKennaway’s device operates causally predicts almost perfectly its behavior. Do you have a better method?