Unknown: sorry, my reply came off a bit less polite than it should have. But my point of “that’s not the meaning I intended to convey with those words and you know it” stands. I would not consider mathematical structures to be a being of will. They may encode some, though. But to simply define “has definite results rather than random” = “will” seems to be to be shaky at best.
Besides, you seemed to be doing this: “Things acting on will cause definite results rather than random, therefore anything that causes definite results rather than random is acting on will”, which is clearly a bit of an error, no?
Unknown: sorry, my reply came off a bit less polite than it should have. But my point of “that’s not the meaning I intended to convey with those words and you know it” stands. I would not consider mathematical structures to be a being of will. They may encode some, though. But to simply define “has definite results rather than random” = “will” seems to be to be shaky at best.
Besides, you seemed to be doing this: “Things acting on will cause definite results rather than random, therefore anything that causes definite results rather than random is acting on will”, which is clearly a bit of an error, no?