What’s the point of discussing whether atheism is a religion? There must be something about that back in the discussion of Rube and Bleggs.
Same for discussion of whether someone is an atheist or a theist by using different definitions for “god” or “universe” or whatever … once you know Elizier’s beliefs, addind a label isn’t useful information.
What’s the point of discussing whether atheism is a religion? There must be something about that back in the discussion of Rube and Bleggs.
Same for discussion of whether someone is an atheist or a theist by using different definitions for “god” or “universe” or whatever … once you know Elizier’s beliefs, addind a label isn’t useful information.