As someone who agrees with Stalin in, well, most of the questions (with a few exceptions, some of them are quite important, but it’s not that important to explain there), what could I say?
There are newer papers on IQ and race, and a lot of critique of that one.
My dad have scored around 170, and considers IQ tests pointless.
I agree with your point about the male-looking face.
It’s pointless to pretend that LGBT+ is not an organisation with ideology. By the way, their ideology is too backwards and reactionary in relation to what do WE plan, regarding the sex and family.
Yes, setting a question of racial IQ dependency is bad. Human intelligence is dependent on its development around their whole life and usage. Making such questions, you begin to act to create proofs for them (self-fulfilling prediction, aha), and thus go against the basic principles of democracy.
As someone who agrees with Stalin in, well, most of the questions (with a few exceptions, some of them are quite important, but it’s not that important to explain there), what could I say?
There are newer papers on IQ and race, and a lot of critique of that one.
Ability to solve IQ tests can differ in a single person, for like 10+ points. https://www.reuters.com/article/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/study-finds-poverty-reduces-brain-power-idUSL6N0GU1PO/
My dad have scored around 170, and considers IQ tests pointless.
I agree with your point about the male-looking face.
It’s pointless to pretend that LGBT+ is not an organisation with ideology. By the way, their ideology is too backwards and reactionary in relation to what do WE plan, regarding the sex and family.
Yes, setting a question of racial IQ dependency is bad. Human intelligence is dependent on its development around their whole life and usage. Making such questions, you begin to act to create proofs for them (self-fulfilling prediction, aha), and thus go against the basic principles of democracy.
Yes, “high IQ jews” goes into the same dumpster.