After the rest of the USA is destroyed the very unstable situation (especially taking into account how many people have guns) is quite likely. In my opinion countries (and remote parts of countries) that will not be under attack at all are much better
I don’t know anything about this topic. My initial thought is “Well, maybe I’d move to Montana.” Why is this no good?
Montana has many ICBM silos, so is a relatively likely target in a serious confrontation involving the US.
After the rest of the USA is destroyed the very unstable situation (especially taking into account how many people have guns) is quite likely. In my opinion countries (and remote parts of countries) that will not be under attack at all are much better
tyty this makes sense