Ha, interesting take. That last sentence was not actually an endorsement of horrible murderous things happening, it was just my way of saying “Now let’s get down to business” about the home stretch of the story.
Thanks for the clarification! I retract my objections.
As for the common criticism, although I’m as adamant as the next person here that “p=1” is impossible without infinite evidence, I don’t think that fact demands that every casual conversation must quantify “1 minus epsilon” or even explicitly acknowledge it.
Ha, interesting take. That last sentence was not actually an endorsement of horrible murderous things happening, it was just my way of saying “Now let’s get down to business” about the home stretch of the story.
Thanks for the clarification! I retract my objections.
As for the common criticism, although I’m as adamant as the next person here that “p=1” is impossible without infinite evidence, I don’t think that fact demands that every casual conversation must quantify “1 minus epsilon” or even explicitly acknowledge it.