Odd that, in a paean to Reason, the deciding factor in how a line of argument is evaluated is how it makes someone feel.
Is it not possible that looking for support for claims we believe to be absurd feels different than looking for support for claims we take very seriously?
Odd that, in a paean to Reason, the deciding factor in how a line of argument is evaluated is how it makes someone feel.
Is it not possible that looking for support for claims we believe to be absurd feels different than looking for support for claims we take very seriously?