I don’t see any request for explicit communication in that manual in the sense of NVC or radical honesty. Giving a topic to a committee is a way to deal in a less direct way with it and NVC and radical honesty are about dealing more directly with it.
Which if a given set of feelings are counterproductive to the mission? To the individual? To the team?
When a feeling is unproductive, that doesn’t imply that it’s bad to speak them out. Speaking it out and them moving on the next minute is often the fastest way to release the feeling.
This notion might be hard to believe for a person who never did Focusing/NVC or radical honesty well but speaking out a feeling in any of those paradigms isn’t a way to let the feeling linger. Most of the time, you speak it out and then get a felt shift and it’s gone if you do it properly.
The military wants to train people in a way where they kill and follow orders against their own better judgement. That’s a particular goal and most of our organizations don’t need people who are trained like that.
I don’t see any request for explicit communication in that manual in the sense of NVC or radical honesty. Giving a topic to a committee is a way to deal in a less direct way with it and NVC and radical honesty are about dealing more directly with it.
When a feeling is unproductive, that doesn’t imply that it’s bad to speak them out. Speaking it out and them moving on the next minute is often the fastest way to release the feeling.
This notion might be hard to believe for a person who never did Focusing/NVC or radical honesty well but speaking out a feeling in any of those paradigms isn’t a way to let the feeling linger. Most of the time, you speak it out and then get a felt shift and it’s gone if you do it properly.
The military wants to train people in a way where they kill and follow orders against their own better judgement. That’s a particular goal and most of our organizations don’t need people who are trained like that.