if the two agents are able to accurately predict each others’ actions and reason using FDT, then it is possible for the two agents to cooperate
Couldn’t you equally require QV participants pre-commit to non-collusion?
I think this could work in small groups. However pre-commitment to non-collusion requires trust between the entire electorate, whereas collusion requires trust only between the two people who are colluding.
I think the main difficulty here is that defining non-collusion might be a bit tricky, but it could probably work with some assumptions.
Couldn’t you equally require QV participants pre-commit to non-collusion?
I think this could work in small groups. However pre-commitment to non-collusion requires trust between the entire electorate, whereas collusion requires trust only between the two people who are colluding.
I think the main difficulty here is that defining non-collusion might be a bit tricky, but it could probably work with some assumptions.