Very well, since you are comfortable with it, let us take a look at this comment:
That doesn’t read like a description of lived experience at all, let alone the specific experience I asked about.
This was in response to Annoyance’s description of the experience of realizing your difficulties have been the result of a mistake, that once understood, seems really simple.
Your criticism, did not explain what you mean by a lived experience, or a experience of the first dhyana you had previously asked for, and you certainly did not explain how this is different from what Annoyance described (if something specific was missing from the description, it would be sufficient to say what that was).
And in response Annoyance reiterated his points, which would be unlikely to satisfy you. If you had instead offered a more concrete criticism, that gave some information about what a good answer would look like, what form it would take, then maybe Annoyance could have produced an answer that you would have considered good.
Very well, since you are comfortable with it, let us take a look at this comment:
This was in response to Annoyance’s description of the experience of realizing your difficulties have been the result of a mistake, that once understood, seems really simple.
Your criticism, did not explain what you mean by a lived experience, or a experience of the first dhyana you had previously asked for, and you certainly did not explain how this is different from what Annoyance described (if something specific was missing from the description, it would be sufficient to say what that was).
And in response Annoyance reiterated his points, which would be unlikely to satisfy you. If you had instead offered a more concrete criticism, that gave some information about what a good answer would look like, what form it would take, then maybe Annoyance could have produced an answer that you would have considered good.