Singularitarians are, IMHO, a subtype of Tranhumanists who are (1) focused on the Intelligence Explosion rather than nanotech, life extension, cryopreservation, Cyborg art, or any other Transhumanist area, and (2) do something about it.
Of course, people canbe Singularitarians and also other things as well, and people can believe something is a good idea without doing anything about it, but the above definition seems significant enough to be worth having a name for.
You could also potentially be a Singularitarian but not a Transhumanist, if you focused on AGI safety and even Friendliness, without caring about the entire H+ memeplex. Though there may be nobody like this today, I can imagine a future in which a game theorist or other scientist enters the field out of a combined desire to do good and to boost their career, but is not interested in all the other stuff.
I had assumed the question was more aimed towards LessWrong, not serious academic usage. I’d expect academic references to be in the form “I work for MIRI”, not cutesy shorthand.
Still, no one walks around calling themself a CSAILian. If there are people calling themselves Mirians, even if those people aren’t directly affiliated with MIRI, that could hurt MIRI’s credibility, I suspect, because it would make them seem unusual relative to other serious research groups.
Now, all we need is a replacement for “Singularitarian” … this, time, one that people can get right when they try to repeat it.
What happened to futurist, transhumanist, extropian?
Transhumanist
Already exists, and not all transhumanists are singularitarians.
Transhumanist
Singularitarians are, IMHO, a subtype of Tranhumanists who are (1) focused on the Intelligence Explosion rather than nanotech, life extension, cryopreservation, Cyborg art, or any other Transhumanist area, and (2) do something about it.
Of course, people canbe Singularitarians and also other things as well, and people can believe something is a good idea without doing anything about it, but the above definition seems significant enough to be worth having a name for.
You could also potentially be a Singularitarian but not a Transhumanist, if you focused on AGI safety and even Friendliness, without caring about the entire H+ memeplex. Though there may be nobody like this today, I can imagine a future in which a game theorist or other scientist enters the field out of a combined desire to do good and to boost their career, but is not interested in all the other stuff.
Mirian seems easy to say :)
That’s a terrible idea if they want to maintain credibility as a serious independent bunch of academic types.
I had assumed the question was more aimed towards LessWrong, not serious academic usage. I’d expect academic references to be in the form “I work for MIRI”, not cutesy shorthand.
Still, no one walks around calling themself a CSAILian. If there are people calling themselves Mirians, even if those people aren’t directly affiliated with MIRI, that could hurt MIRI’s credibility, I suspect, because it would make them seem unusual relative to other serious research groups.
“Phyg” member! ;)
“phygger”
“Dirty phygger”?
“Phyglet”.
Isn’t the term itself kind of a phyg leaf?
I’m sure that’s just a phygment of your imagination.
I don’t think I’ve seen a pun thread on lesswrong before… Perhaps it’s one of those things that should stay on reddit.