The aim is to be even more specific—the values of a specific human at a specific time. Then what we do with these syntheses is another point, how much change to allow, etc… Including other humans in the past is a choice that we then need to make, or not.
I see, thank you. So then, would you say this doesn’t & isn’t intended to answer any question like “whose perspective should be taken into account?”, but that it instead assumes some answer to that question has already been specified, & is meant to address what to do given this chosen perspective?
The aim is to be even more specific—the values of a specific human at a specific time. Then what we do with these syntheses is another point, how much change to allow, etc… Including other humans in the past is a choice that we then need to make, or not.
I see, thank you. So then, would you say this doesn’t & isn’t intended to answer any question like “whose perspective should be taken into account?”, but that it instead assumes some answer to that question has already been specified, & is meant to address what to do given this chosen perspective?
It doesn’t intend to answer those questions; but those questions become a lot easier to answer once this issue is solved.