Digital immortality seems much cheaper than cryonics and of similar effectiveness. Why isn’t it more popular?
It has less chances of success as there is several non solved theoretical problems of personal identity. Also there is no much public leaders approving it. Yudkowsky was against. In my plan is just plan C—if antiaging and cryonics fail.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Digital immortality seems much cheaper than cryonics and of similar effectiveness. Why isn’t it more popular?
It has less chances of success as there is several non solved theoretical problems of personal identity. Also there is no much public leaders approving it. Yudkowsky was against. In my plan is just plan C—if antiaging and cryonics fail.