The livelihood argument only goes to motivation, and Eliezer’s motivation is of no interest to me. Why should it be? I don’t need to trust his motivation—I only need to read and evaluate his arguments. Or am I missing something?
The livelihood argument only goes to motivation, and Eliezer’s motivation is of no interest to me. Why should it be? I don’t need to trust his motivation—I only need to read and evaluate his arguments. Or am I missing something?