Only answer if you think the chance of a singularity in the 21st century is over 1%. Do you think affecting the singularity’s outcome is tractable enough to be worth any of your time or money?
Only answer if you think the chance of a singularity in the 21st century is over 1%. Do you think affecting the singularity’s outcome is tractable enough to be worth any of your time or money?
“Only answer if” is bad design in this case. It makes more sense to ask for the chance of a singularity and ask the second question at the same time.
Question suggestions:
Only answer if you think the chance of a singularity in the 21st century is over 1%. Do you think affecting the singularity’s outcome is tractable enough to be worth any of your time or money?
Are you a narcissist? (rationale)
(This is only for people who had an SAT score out of 1600) Did you take the SAT after (or during) April 1995?
And actually, the narcissism question is not yes or no. Here it is:
To what extent do you agree with this statement: “I am a narcissist.” (Note: The word “narcissist” means egotistical, self-focused, and vain.)
1=not very true of me 2 3 4 5 6 7=very true of me
“Only answer if” is bad design in this case. It makes more sense to ask for the chance of a singularity and ask the second question at the same time.
If Yvain wants to include another question then I’d agree. E.g.,
What do you think the chance of a technological singularity in the 21st century is?
Do you think affecting a singularity’s outcome is tractable enough to be worth your time or money?
Also I realized that “after (or during) April 1995” is better since the recentered SAT started in April.