Here’s a very “interesting” take on this community: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ku9b-fPa1s
His “no evidence for Bayes, and therefore trusting Bayes is unskeptical” argument seems weak. Don’t all ideas of evidence require philosophical underpinnings?
Also discussed here.
Here’s a very “interesting” take on this community: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ku9b-fPa1s
His “no evidence for Bayes, and therefore trusting Bayes is unskeptical” argument seems weak. Don’t all ideas of evidence require philosophical underpinnings?
Also discussed here.