Tasha McCauley seems very much like the X-factor in this conversation. I feel like the other 3 members motives can be fairly well implied by evidence / actions / publications. But McCauley has a very very low profile. John Loeber wrote an excellent timeline and analysis of the OpenAI board that I feel is useful for this conversation:
And I tried to piece together the salient data points of Tasha McCauley’s career & bio from all the oblique article mentions, just to collect them in one place:
Tasha McCauley seems very much like the X-factor in this conversation. I feel like the other 3 members motives can be fairly well implied by evidence / actions / publications. But McCauley has a very very low profile. John Loeber wrote an excellent timeline and analysis of the OpenAI board that I feel is useful for this conversation:
https://loeber.substack.com/p/a-timeline-of-the-openai-board
And I tried to piece together the salient data points of Tasha McCauley’s career & bio from all the oblique article mentions, just to collect them in one place:
https://gregoreite.com/who-is-tasha-mccauley-openai-board-member/
Enjoy.