>He also is a fanofEA. More specifically, he supports the idea of first saving up your money so that you can retire, and then spending your time on EA once you’re retired.
You see, though, how there’s a basic conflict between those philosophies. For the Mustachian, giving to charity only comes after you’re a millionaire yourself (or however you define FI).
I don’t think this is representative among established EAs (although admittedly common among newcomers)
I think it’s real bad that EAs ever pushed such a narrow conception of what EA means, and I think it’s a fairly common, although not necessarily majority viewpoint among EAs that donating as soon as you can is a mistake.)
Ah, I see what you mean. Although my understanding of the EA movement is that it’s very acceptable, or even advisable to spend enough on yourself so that you’re reasonably comfortable, ie. living a Mustachian lifestyle. In which case the difference is just a matter of timing: a Mustachian first puts their money towards their own retirement and then puts it towards EA, whereas an EA puts it towards both in parallel. That doesn’t seem like a large difference in philosophy to me. What do you think? Am I thinking about this the wrong way?
after you’re a millionaire yourself (or however you define FI)
This is tangential, but $1M seems like it’s on the high end. I think that a lot of Mustachians would be retiring at more like $500-700k.
>He also is a fan of EA. More specifically, he supports the idea of first saving up your money so that you can retire, and then spending your time on EA once you’re retired.
You see, though, how there’s a basic conflict between those philosophies. For the Mustachian, giving to charity only comes after you’re a millionaire yourself (or however you define FI).
I don’t think this is representative among established EAs (although admittedly common among newcomers)
I think it’s real bad that EAs ever pushed such a narrow conception of what EA means, and I think it’s a fairly common, although not necessarily majority viewpoint among EAs that donating as soon as you can is a mistake.)
My own article on this is here:
https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/3ijnLaws7mCEogD6H/earning-to-save-give-1-save-10
Ah, I see what you mean. Although my understanding of the EA movement is that it’s very acceptable, or even advisable to spend enough on yourself so that you’re reasonably comfortable, ie. living a Mustachian lifestyle. In which case the difference is just a matter of timing: a Mustachian first puts their money towards their own retirement and then puts it towards EA, whereas an EA puts it towards both in parallel. That doesn’t seem like a large difference in philosophy to me. What do you think? Am I thinking about this the wrong way?
This is tangential, but $1M seems like it’s on the high end. I think that a lot of Mustachians would be retiring at more like $500-700k.