insofar as we can preserve tigers as a species in zoos or with genetic materials I’d say the people are more valuable, but if killing these tigers wiped out the species, they’re worth more.
Wow, those are some hugely divergent preferences from mine. I’m pretty sure I would trade the lives of all the remaining tigers in India to keep my family alive. I’ll have to update what I expect human-CEV to look like (given that are preferences are likely much closer than that of a randomly selected person [since we had to pass through many filters to end up on this web forum]).
insofar as we can preserve tigers as a species in zoos or with genetic materials I’d say the people are more valuable, but if killing these tigers wiped out the species, they’re worth more.
What about 1,500 people, instead of 150? 15,000? 150,000?
I haven’t done the math. 1,500 people feels like a line, 15,000 people feels like enough.
Wow, those are some hugely divergent preferences from mine. I’m pretty sure I would trade the lives of all the remaining tigers in India to keep my family alive. I’ll have to update what I expect human-CEV to look like (given that are preferences are likely much closer than that of a randomly selected person [since we had to pass through many filters to end up on this web forum]).
Id trade a lot more random humans for my family than I would for tigers.