Why did you call the Google article “exit, voice, and loyalty”? That’s the title of a book by Hirschman and on first skimming it seems to be related but I don’t understand why exactly you chose that line.
I’m implying that Hirschman’s classification offers some insight into the dynamics of that incident; if you aren’t familiar with it, it’s probably an opaque allusion. (I wouldn’t say it’s a great book: it’s a good trichotomy, but it doesn’t really merit a whole book and would be better off as an article. On the other hand, it’s not a very long book.)
Economics:
“Dirty medicine”
Peak scientist
“Slippery Business: The trade in adulterated olive oil”
“The Industrial Revolution: Past and Future” (Lucas on the Great Divergence, economic growth, the Asian miracles, and redistributionism.)
“Of Frightened Horses and Autonomous Vehicles: Tort Law and its Assimilation of Innovations”, Graham 2012 (excerpts)
“Beware the Middleman: Empirical Analysis of Bitcoin-Exchange Risk”, Moore & Christin 2013 (excerpts)
NASHX
“Love, luck and destiny: the world according to a Mumbai matriarch”
“Bacon: Why America’s Favorite Food Mania Happened”
“Nowhere is safe in EVE Online as Goonswarm suicide-bombs galactic trade hub” (shades of Eurisko)
the Currin Trading Ponzi: part 1, part 2
“When Korea’s E-Sports was at the Brink of Death”
“Google’s Lost Social Network” (exit, voice, and loyalty)
Obsolete occupations: breaker boy, crossing sweeper, dog whipper
Old Economy Steven
Philosophy:
“Why Did why the lucky stiff Quit? …or, is this time well spent?”
Wrongful life
“The Wish Never to Have Been Born”, Cavan 1932 (excerpts)
“Newtonian Ethics”
I’m always so impressed by how much you contribute to these threads. Thanks.
I am living this reality every day...
Here here...
Why did you call the Google article “exit, voice, and loyalty”? That’s the title of a book by Hirschman and on first skimming it seems to be related but I don’t understand why exactly you chose that line.
I’m implying that Hirschman’s classification offers some insight into the dynamics of that incident; if you aren’t familiar with it, it’s probably an opaque allusion. (I wouldn’t say it’s a great book: it’s a good trichotomy, but it doesn’t really merit a whole book and would be better off as an article. On the other hand, it’s not a very long book.)