While the house example does describe something that works against rather than for the (legibly) privileged, I don’t see how it’s specifically about interpretive labor—can you explain more?
Well, when those people tried to voice their complaints they were dismissed by many commentators. So it’s an example of people being unwilling to expend perform interpretive labour to emphasise with them.
While the house example does describe something that works against rather than for the (legibly) privileged, I don’t see how it’s specifically about interpretive labor—can you explain more?
Well, when those people tried to voice their complaints they were dismissed by many commentators. So it’s an example of people being unwilling to expend perform interpretive labour to emphasise with them.
There’s no evidence that the house owners instead empathized with the many commentators, nor would doing so have particularly helped them.