Is it conventional to add sources when it is an on-line? Sorry didn’t know that was expected, since it wasn’t in the posting rule set. Will remember to add sources in the future.
BTW gwern sometimes your attention to detail is as unnerving as it is helpful and impressive.
Is it conventional to add sources when it is an on-line source?
I thought it was, but then, I may be interested only because it makes it easier in the future to track down citations if there is a title and URL (and because if I click on a URL, it goes into my archive bot).
BTW gwern sometimes your attention to detail is as unnerving as it is helpful and impressive.
It’s just time-wasting… Heck, I time-waste on my time-wasting, I’m supposed to be adding citations on how people are biased against spaced repetition even when their scores are better with SR to my respective article.
Please remember sources; this is from “How I Stopped Believing in Democracy”, 31 January 2008.
Is it conventional to add sources when it is an on-line? Sorry didn’t know that was expected, since it wasn’t in the posting rule set. Will remember to add sources in the future.
BTW gwern sometimes your attention to detail is as unnerving as it is helpful and impressive.
I thought it was, but then, I may be interested only because it makes it easier in the future to track down citations if there is a title and URL (and because if I click on a URL, it goes into my archive bot).
It’s just time-wasting… Heck, I time-waste on my time-wasting, I’m supposed to be adding citations on how people are biased against spaced repetition even when their scores are better with SR to my respective article.