This analysis assumes that we won’t do geoengineering. If we do geoengineering to keep temperatures from increasing too much over the present point all the spending on mitigation is wasted.
This analysis assumes that we will succeed in geoengineering without further deleterious externalities, which has less than no current basis
No, spending on adapting a country to be able to handle +2C warming doesn’t help you with random deleterious externalities.
I agree that responsible policy is preferable to ecosystem stress testing
It seems like you ignore what the above exchange was about.
This analysis assumes that we won’t do geoengineering. If we do geoengineering to keep temperatures from increasing too much over the present point all the spending on mitigation is wasted.
This analysis assumes that we will succeed in geoengineering without further deleterious externalities, which has less than no current basis
No, spending on adapting a country to be able to handle +2C warming doesn’t help you with random deleterious externalities.
I agree that responsible policy is preferable to ecosystem stress testing
It seems like you ignore what the above exchange was about.