Is a non-natural fact, a fact that can’t be discovered by empiricism, or a fact that can’t be discovered by empiricism+logic?
The frosting is the only thing the non-natural normative realist cares about.
If there are moral facts, whether natural or not, everyone should care about them. If they are accessible by abstract reasoning, then arguments from the causal closure of the physical don’t apply.
Is a non-natural fact, a fact that can’t be discovered by empiricism, or a fact that can’t be discovered by empiricism+logic?
If there are moral facts, whether natural or not, everyone should care about them. If they are accessible by abstract reasoning, then arguments from the causal closure of the physical don’t apply.