Your right. I did some python. My version took 1.26, yours 0.78 microseconds. My code is just another point on the Pareto boundary.
Whoa! I wasn’t expecting so much of a difference. Did you use ```for i in range(...)``` for your loop? That range() call returns an iterator, which I imagine isn’t too fast.
Your right. I did some python. My version took 1.26, yours 0.78 microseconds. My code is just another point on the Pareto boundary.
Whoa! I wasn’t expecting so much of a difference. Did you use ```for i in range(...)``` for your loop? That range() call returns an iterator, which I imagine isn’t too fast.