Your advice is a summary of the thesis of the article… I never claimed any certainty. All I’m trying to convey is that there is something interesting here, some probability of theoretical importance, and that more precise analysis than we’ve been able to give it is needed.
We can explore cultural and societal implications, which motivates the theory, but we arn’t really in the position to advance the theory ourselves.
If you have refutations, I’d appreciate if you’d be generous enough to maybe hint at what they are, if that wouldn’t be too hard?
Your advice is a summary of the thesis of the article… I never claimed any certainty. All I’m trying to convey is that there is something interesting here, some probability of theoretical importance, and that more precise analysis than we’ve been able to give it is needed.
We can explore cultural and societal implications, which motivates the theory, but we arn’t really in the position to advance the theory ourselves.
If you have refutations, I’d appreciate if you’d be generous enough to maybe hint at what they are, if that wouldn’t be too hard?