You’d need to present evidence of a human being performing an operation that can’t be done by a Turing machine. That’s quite easy: I can lift a rock, a Turing machine can’t. So… you support euthanasia for quadriplegics, then, or anyone else who can’t pick up a rock?
You’d need to present evidence of a human being performing an operation that can’t be done by a Turing machine. That’s quite easy: I can lift a rock, a Turing machine can’t.
You’d need to present evidence of a human being performing an operation that can’t be done by a Turing machine.
That’s quite easy: I can lift a rock, a Turing machine can’t.
So… you support euthanasia for quadriplegics, then, or anyone else who can’t pick up a rock?
This doesn’t make sense. Downvoted for seeming attempt to divert the argument by implying I’m cruel to disabled people.
This doesn’t make sense.
That’s not my fault. You’re the one who brought lifting rocks into a discussion about the ethics of terminating conscious entities. ;-)
This doesn’t make sense. Downvoted for seeming attempt to divert the argument by implying I’m cruel to disabled people.
That’s not my fault. You’re the one who brought lifting rocks into a discussion about the ethics of terminating conscious entities. ;-)