How is my approach my more prescriptive than yours? Also, what do you mean by “Eliezer’s worlds”?
(Ps. I asked about observer 2′s behaviour, not observer 1′s)
When you say something like “we need to focus on your state of knowledge instead” it is a prescription :)
Sorry if I renamed your observers, unless I misunderstood the whole setup, which is also possible.
Eliezer often writes, or used to write, something like “It may help to visualize a collection of worlds—Everett branches or Tegmark duplicates” when talking about counterfactuals.
How is my approach my more prescriptive than yours? Also, what do you mean by “Eliezer’s worlds”?
(Ps. I asked about observer 2′s behaviour, not observer 1′s)
When you say something like “we need to focus on your state of knowledge instead” it is a prescription :)
Sorry if I renamed your observers, unless I misunderstood the whole setup, which is also possible.
Eliezer often writes, or used to write, something like “It may help to visualize a collection of worlds—Everett branches or Tegmark duplicates” when talking about counterfactuals.