It is actually impossible to implement “shut up and mutliply” literally, if you aren’t accurately described by a utility function.
I said “shut up and calculate” and “under your judgement” for effect, though they are in some ways contradictory. Many LessWrongers know you cannot always trust their intuition but most people want to trust their intuition. I can persuade people by promising them they can do both.
Why is discussion of overcoming biases worthwhile, but not discussion of important strategies for the future of humanity?
Answering this would require taking CEV seriously which would undermine my rhetorical position.
If you do in fact have something to boast about, please go ahead and tell us about it.
I cannot allow my real-life accomplishments to be associated with my identity in this community. Are you saying it is taboo to speak about the sad state of affairs in the world?
I said “shut up and calculate” and “under your judgement” for effect, though they are in some ways contradictory. Many LessWrongers know you cannot always trust their intuition but most people want to trust their intuition. I can persuade people by promising them they can do both.
Answering this would require taking CEV seriously which would undermine my rhetorical position.
I cannot allow my real-life accomplishments to be associated with my identity in this community. Are you saying it is taboo to speak about the sad state of affairs in the world?