probabilistic statements are useless in deriving information regarding a specific manifested instantiation
If I understand this correctly you aren’t understanding the nature of subjective probability. But please clarify “specific manifested instantiation”.
If I understand this correctly you aren’t understanding the nature of subjective probability.
No, I understand it perfectly well. I’m asserting that subjective probability is irrelevant in justifying truth-claims.
But please clarify “specific manifested instantiation”.
specific : “Belonging or relating uniquely to a particular subject”
manifest: “Display or show (a quality or feeling) by one’s acts or appearance; demonstrate”
Instatiate: “Represent as or by an instance”
If I understand this correctly you aren’t understanding the nature of subjective probability. But please clarify “specific manifested instantiation”.
No, I understand it perfectly well. I’m asserting that subjective probability is irrelevant in justifying truth-claims.
specific : “Belonging or relating uniquely to a particular subject”
manifest: “Display or show (a quality or feeling) by one’s acts or appearance; demonstrate”
Instatiate: “Represent as or by an instance”