Close enough. (And if your simulation doesn’t match what happened then at least one of these three things is incorrect: your observations, your model, your simulation (you multiplied instead of adding or something).)
In which case, my understanding of your original question is one of the two: why is it the case that the world could be *efficiently* simulated?
It can’t—in its entirety. Abstraction is “the process of removing something”—by removing a lot of things, sometimes what is left can be “efficiently simulated”.
Close enough. (And if your simulation doesn’t match what happened then at least one of these three things is incorrect: your observations, your model, your simulation (you multiplied instead of adding or something).)
It can’t—in its entirety. Abstraction is “the process of removing something”—by removing a lot of things, sometimes what is left can be “efficiently simulated”.