But you could always be missing something. Something can be true even though all the evidence looks bad. But something can also be true if there is no evidence (either good or bad). Something can be true even if the only evidence is fraudulent. Something can be true even if the only evidence for it is that you asked your 6 year old child for an example of science and he told you it.
Why don’t you wonder about any of them being true, instead of just wondering about the case where wishful thinking comes into play?
Why don’t you wonder about any of them being true, instead of just wondering about the case where wishful thinking comes into play?
Could you point me to where I only wondered about “the case where wishful thinking comes into play”?
I am getting the sense that you are arguing against propositions I haven’t put forward. Could you phrase my argument in your own words so we can clarify?
But you could always be missing something. Something can be true even though all the evidence looks bad. But something can also be true if there is no evidence (either good or bad). Something can be true even if the only evidence is fraudulent. Something can be true even if the only evidence for it is that you asked your 6 year old child for an example of science and he told you it.
Why don’t you wonder about any of them being true, instead of just wondering about the case where wishful thinking comes into play?
Could you point me to where I only wondered about “the case where wishful thinking comes into play”?
I am getting the sense that you are arguing against propositions I haven’t put forward. Could you phrase my argument in your own words so we can clarify?