Which is true, but rarely persuasive. And it’s not really an argument for supporting organizations that are working to develop the technology, which is more important. (I imagine once a cure for aging actually exists, it will be relatively easy to persuade people to take it.)
And focusing on the potential good future has (at least for me) proven more effective than focusing on the utter stupidity of letting people die.
I think the general counter argument there is that people would become bored if they lived forever because they would do everything there is to do. These people aren’t very creative IMO. Or maybe they have just been brainwashed.
Which is true, but rarely persuasive. And it’s not really an argument for supporting organizations that are working to develop the technology, which is more important. (I imagine once a cure for aging actually exists, it will be relatively easy to persuade people to take it.)
And focusing on the potential good future has (at least for me) proven more effective than focusing on the utter stupidity of letting people die.
I think the general counter argument there is that people would become bored if they lived forever because they would do everything there is to do. These people aren’t very creative IMO. Or maybe they have just been brainwashed.