Given that people actually had vastly different predictions for full immunity and antibodies detecting and commercial tests detecting antibodies this just illustrates that you don’t understand the topic well enough to distinguish the different claims to offer a bet that’s worth for anybody to take given their stated beliefs.
It’s clear that you’re arguing in bad faith when you link a comment that was made 5 days after my own as some sort of bizarre justification that people didn’t take my bet. Regardless, my prediction is still true.
“You don’t understand the topic” is the weakest counter argument you could make without any proof.
That’s what I get for trying to engage in debates assuming good-faith, right? Disappointing.
Given that people actually had vastly different predictions for full immunity and antibodies detecting and commercial tests detecting antibodies this just illustrates that you don’t understand the topic well enough to distinguish the different claims to offer a bet that’s worth for anybody to take given their stated beliefs.
It’s clear that you’re arguing in bad faith when you link a comment that was made 5 days after my own as some sort of bizarre justification that people didn’t take my bet. Regardless, my prediction is still true.
“You don’t understand the topic” is the weakest counter argument you could make without any proof.
That’s what I get for trying to engage in debates assuming good-faith, right? Disappointing.