I appreciate Kant’s idea that certain things may arise from how we see and interpret the world. I think it’s plausible that this is an accurate high-level description of things like counterfactuals and probability.
(I’m a bit busy atm so I haven’t provided much detail)
They’re suggesting that you should have written ”...this is an accurate how-level description of things like...” It’s a minor point but I guess I agree.
I appreciate Kant’s idea that certain things may arise from how we see and interpret the world. I think it’s plausible that this is an accurate high-level description of things like counterfactuals and probability.
(I’m a bit busy atm so I haven’t provided much detail)
‘how-level’ would be easier to parse
Oops, I meant “high-level”
“How-level”?
They’re suggesting that you should have written ”...this is an accurate how-level description of things like...” It’s a minor point but I guess I agree.