FWIW I understood Zvi’s comment, but feel like I might not have understood it if I hadn’t played Magic: The Gathering in the past.
EDIT: Although I don’t understand the link to Sir Arthur’s green knight, unless it was a reference to the fact that M:tG doesn’t actually have a green knight card.
I also think I wouldn’t have understood his comments without MTG or at least having read Duncan’s explanation to the MTG color wheel.
(Nitpicking) Though I’d add that MTG doesn’t have a literal Blue Knight card either, so I doubt it’s that reference. (There are knights that are blue and green, but none with the exact names “Blue Knight” or “Green Knight”.)
FWIW I understood Zvi’s comment, but feel like I might not have understood it if I hadn’t played Magic: The Gathering in the past.
EDIT: Although I don’t understand the link to Sir Arthur’s green knight, unless it was a reference to the fact that M:tG doesn’t actually have a green knight card.
The Arthurian Green Knight lets Gawain cut off his head, then picks it up and puts it back on. Trying to use force on the Green Knight is useless.
I also think I wouldn’t have understood his comments without MTG or at least having read Duncan’s explanation to the MTG color wheel.
(Nitpicking) Though I’d add that MTG doesn’t have a literal Blue Knight card either, so I doubt it’s that reference. (There are knights that are blue and green, but none with the exact names “Blue Knight” or “Green Knight”.)
Also the Red Knight card is named “Blood Knight”.