I’m finding some of the points in the post too cryptic or assuming too much background knowledge of your thinking for me to grasp. Can you please explain a bit more or link to past relevant posts?
That’s Favreau’s third booster, because he ‘had a baby at home that was unvaccinated.’ This does not exactly capture the epistemic or cost-benefit analysis high ground.
Why not? What does current epistemic or cost-benefit analysis high ground look like?
Venkatesh Rao, still masking after all these years, also Arnold Kling.
I’m finding some of the points in the post too cryptic or assuming too much background knowledge of your thinking for me to grasp. Can you please explain a bit more or link to past relevant posts?
Why not? What does current epistemic or cost-benefit analysis high ground look like?
What’s the significance of this?
I stopped thinking about Covid all the time, and now the inferential distance has grown so large that I also have a problem following this article.